Ethics and consent
Purpose
This page outlines ethical responsibilities when creating, analysing, and sharing Māori geospatial data. It focuses on trust, care, and long term impacts rather than minimum legal requirements.
Informed consent in mapping projects
Consent must be:
-
Given before data is collected or digitised
-
Based on clear explanation of purpose and risks
-
Specific to the agreed use
-
Able to be withdrawn
Mapping data does not create consent by default.
Consent over time
GIS projects often evolve. New layers, new outputs, or new audiences may change the original intent.
Good practice includes:
-
Checking consent when scope changes
-
Not assuming consent applies to new uses
-
Revisiting decisions when publishing or sharing
Sensitive spatial data
Sensitive data may include:
-
Wāhi tapu and wāhi tūpuna
-
Urupā and burial sites
-
Cultural landscapes
-
Resources under pressure or dispute
Sensitivity is not always obvious from the data itself and must be understood through engagement.
Managing visibility and access
Options for reducing risk include:
-
Generalising locations
-
Masking attributes
-
Limiting scale or resolution
-
Using role based access controls
-
Publishing summaries instead of raw data
Public does not mean appropriate.
Avoiding harm
Potential harms include:
-
Enabling exploitation or vandalism
-
Undermining cultural authority
-
Misinterpretation without context
-
Pressure to disclose more data
Ethical practice requires actively thinking about misuse, not just intended use.
Accountability
Ethical decisions should be:
-
Documented
-
Reviewable
-
Able to be explained
Responsibility continues after publication.