Working with mana whenua and rohe without hard boundaries
GIS likes crisp polygons. Relationships to place do not always behave that way.
A rohe may be represented differently depending on whether the mahi concerns an awa, historical travel, environmental responsibility, a Treaty process, planning, mahinga kai or another kaupapa. Overlap does not have to be treated as an error in the data.
Choose a representation that fits the question
No single option is automatically more Māori. They are different GIS devices for different questions.
Representation patterns
| Pattern | Useful when | What to make visible |
|---|---|---|
| overlapping polygons | several relationships need an area representation | overlap rather than forced exclusivity |
| corridor | an awa, coast, route or access relationship organises the geography | connectivity and direction |
| points plus kōrero | named places carry the important evidence | source and narrative rather than enclosing boundary |
| seasonal layer | use or activity changes through the year | time period and activity |
| historical snapshots | relationships or source evidence differ by period | date and source of each representation |
| indicative extent | evidence supports a broad area but not a precise line | uncertainty in styling and legend |
| network | relationships among places matter more than enclosed area | connections, without pretending a line measures whakapapa |
Overlapping areas
Where polygons are useful, overlap can be shown directly with transparent fills, patterns or separate layers. Do not dissolve the overlap merely because a GIS operation expects mutually exclusive areas.
Awa, coast and routes
For taiao or resilience mahi, the organising geography may be an awa, catchment, coastline or ara. The Awa, wetlands, coast and moana page shows how several representations of the same awa can sit in one project.
Place-to-place mapping
Some research works better as connected places such as maunga, awa, pā, kāinga, marae, mahinga kai and ara tawhito. A sequence or journey can communicate spatial relationships without enclosing them inside one boundary.
For historical work see Archives to map and Historical Māori maps.
Time matters
If a relationship varies by season, activity or historical period, use separate layers, a time field or a series of maps. A timeless polygon can hide important change.
Public administrative representations
Te Kāhui Māngai provides mapped areas for particular administrative and Treaty-related purposes and notes that areas can be indicative and overlapping. Treat those layers as source representations with a stated purpose rather than silently renaming an area of interest to an iwi boundary.
Legends and metadata
Wording can prevent an indicative geometry looking more certain than it is. Examples include:
Indicative area prepared for this project, not a cadastral boundary.Several overlapping source representations are shown.Extent interpreted from historical source dated 1898.Generalised locality rather than exact geometry.
Record source, date, purpose, scale and known limitations with the layer.
Use Cartography and map communication for styling and Authoritative for what? for source interpretation.
Related pages
- Whakapapa and mapping
- Things GIS cannot represent well
- Whenua mapping
- Awa as the organising geography
Last reviewed: 26 August 2026