Skip to main content

Māori GIS history in Aotearoa

Māori GIS did not begin with one conference, one organisation, one software platform or one person. It developed through many strands of work in iwi, hapū, Māori organisations, universities, government agencies, consultancies and practitioner networks. Claimant mapping and Waitangi Tribunal work were important parts of that story, as were cultural mapping, place names, environmental projects, Māori land, Indigenous mapping workshops, practitioner networks and the gradual shift from producing maps for people toward helping communities build and control their own geospatial capability.

This page brings together a series of practitioner articles about parts of that history. They are not presented as a definitive institutional history of Māori GIS. They describe work I participated in, witnessed or supported and the lessons that emerged from it, while recognising that cultural authority, mātauranga, local history and decisions about Māori information belong with the people and communities who hold them. The recurring themes are less about particular software products than about whenua, whakapapa, authority, provenance, rangatiratanga, capability and the question of what should remain after the technical specialist has gone home.

Start with the long history​

From DVDs to AI: twenty years around Māori GIS, mapping and capability​

The main long-form history follows the work from claimant mapping in the mid-2000s through Waitangi Tribunal hearings, Māori GIS conferences, capability projects, Indigenous Mapping Wānanga, online practitioner networks, Ngā Poutama Matawhenua and the arrival of AI. It also develops the idea of State of Unknown, the useful discipline of not allowing technical precision to pretend that historical or cultural uncertainty has disappeared.

Mapping, authority and uncertainty​

State of Unknown: Māori GIS, precision, uncertainty and authority​

Historical maps, cadastral parcels and modern GIS can create an appearance of certainty that the underlying evidence does not always support. This article looks at uncertainty, provenance, place names, historical boundaries and why sometimes the most accurate map is the one that leaves a question unresolved.

The best map sometimes leaves things out​

Good mapping is not measured by how much information can be placed on the screen. This article looks at sensitive places, audience, permissions and the practical reasons a map may be more useful and more respectful when some information is deliberately withheld or generalised.

From outputs to capability​

After the mapper leaves​

One of the persistent problems in community GIS is dependency on the person who built the system. This article follows the shift from delivering maps and resource packages toward building capability, succession and systems that remain understandable after the original specialist leaves.

When Māori GIS came on ten DVDs​

In the 2000s, making GIS more accessible could involve ArcReader projects, imagery, data and a numbered set of DVDs. The technology now looks dated, but the underlying problem is still current: how do you make useful geospatial capability available without creating a new dependency?

Monday morning GIS​

A workshop can create confidence for a day. Capability is what remains on Monday morning when the trainer is gone, the software looks slightly different and a real project has to be completed. This article looks at the less glamorous work of follow-up, practice, documentation and support.

Communities and wānanga​

From conferences to wānanga​

Māori GIS practitioner communities developed through conferences, informal networks, Te Kāhui Manu Hōkai, Indigenous Mapping Wānanga and later online forms of support. The important history is not just the events themselves, but the whanaungatanga, practical organising and shared learning that allowed people to remain connected between them.

Cloud mapping without the cloud​

The 2017 Indigenous Mapping Wānanga at Claudelands offered an unusually direct lesson in infrastructure when a programme using cloud mapping tools met inadequate venue Wi-Fi. The story is funny in hindsight, but it makes a serious point about access: software is not accessible merely because it exists online.

Rangatiratanga and data​

We will never ask you for your data​

One of the principles that became central to Ngā Poutama Matawhenua is that practical support does not require people to surrender control of their information. The article connects modern training practice with older lessons from claimant mapping about authority, permissions, provenance and the difference between technical custody and the right to decide how information is used.

The history sits alongside the practical material elsewhere on MāoriGIS.nz. The Matawhenua Māori GIS Starter Kit provides a free QGIS starting point, Kaupapa Māori GIS explores the limits of conventional spatial representations, Māori Data Sovereignty for GIS focuses on authority and governance, and the Ngā Poutama Matawhenua resources bring together current wānanga recordings and examples.

The history is still developing. New tools will continue to arrive, but the enduring questions are much older: who has authority, whose knowledge is being represented, what relationships sit behind the information, what should remain private, and whether the technology leaves people with more control than they had before.