Further reading and frameworks
MāoriGIS.nz is a practical guide, not the final authority for every kaupapa. Māori Data Sovereignty, AI governance, privacy, data ethics and technology are developing fields, and different iwi, hapū, whānau, Māori organisations, researchers and public agencies may have their own requirements and tikanga.
Use this page as a research starting point. Follow the source organisations, look for updated material, compare frameworks, and consider whether what you learn changes how your own GIS or AI mahi should be designed.
Māori-led sources
Start here where Māori data, Māori authority or AI use involving Māori information is part of the kaupapa.
- Te Mana Raraunga and its Principles of Māori Data Sovereignty.
- Te Kāhui Raraunga and the Māori Data Governance Model.
- Te Kāhui Raraunga — Māori AI Governance Framework.
- Te Kāhui Raraunga — Māori AI Governance FAQ, including questions about what policies, processes, practices and capability an organisation may need.
- Te Kāhui Raraunga — Ngā Hua / Resources for current reports, guidance and resources.
- Kā Huru Manu and Ngāi Tahu cultural mapping information as examples of iwi-led place-based information and cultural mapping.
Do not assume one Māori organisation's decisions automatically transfer to another iwi or hapū context. The value of these sources is partly in the questions and governance approaches they provide.
Data ethics and public-sector guidance
For work in or with government, councils or Crown-funded programmes, consider the current official guidance as well as Māori-led sources.
- Ngā Tikanga Paihere uses tikanga to guide safe, responsible and culturally appropriate data use.
- Algorithm Charter for Aotearoa New Zealand covers transparency, partnership, people, data, privacy, ethics and human oversight.
- NZ Digital Government — Artificial intelligence is the current entry point for public-service AI guidance.
- Public Service AI Framework covers responsible AI principles for the New Zealand public service.
- Responsible AI Guidance for the Public Service covers governance, security, procurement, privacy, hallucinations, accountability and other operational issues.
- Algorithm Impact Assessment user guide provides a structured public-sector assessment approach.
If you work inside an organisation, its own approved policies, security standards and risk processes may be more restrictive or more specific than public guidance. Check those before adopting software or processing organisational information.
Privacy and personal information
Māori data and personal information overlap but are not the same thing. Privacy law does not answer every Māori Data Sovereignty question, and Māori Data Sovereignty does not remove Privacy Act obligations where personal information is involved.
- Office of the Privacy Commissioner — Artificial Intelligence and the Information Privacy Principles explains how New Zealand privacy requirements apply to AI use.
- Office of the Privacy Commissioner — Privacy Impact Assessments provides guidance for assessing privacy effects before and during a project.
For GIS, remember that a location, address, small-area geography or combination of attributes can make apparently de-identified information identifiable again. See Inference risk.
Indigenous data governance beyond Aotearoa
International Indigenous frameworks can broaden the research without replacing Māori authority or local tikanga.
- Global Indigenous Data Alliance — CARE Principles focuses on Collective Benefit, Authority to Control, Responsibility and Ethics.
- Local Contexts provides Traditional Knowledge and Biocultural Labels and Notices for communicating provenance, protocols and community expectations.
- First Nations Information Governance Centre — OCAP provides a First Nations framework based on Ownership, Control, Access and Possession.
Use these comparatively. They can offer useful concepts and practical tools, but they arise from different Indigenous nations and legal, political and cultural settings.
Research and scholarship
Useful academic work includes Indigenous Data Sovereignty, Māori algorithmic sovereignty, critical cartography, GIS ethics, Indigenous mapping and the social effects of automated systems.
A starting point for AI is Brown et al. (2024), Māori Algorithmic Sovereignty: Idea, Principles, and Use.
For wider reading, search recent work by Māori data researchers and Indigenous data sovereignty scholars rather than relying only on technology vendors or generic AI commentary. Check publication dates carefully because AI product behaviour, policy and governance guidance can change quickly.
Project-specific sources
The most useful source may not be a national framework. Depending on the mahi, also look for:
- iwi or hapū data and mātauranga policies
- trust, rūnanga or Māori land organisation policies
- relevant settlement legislation or statutory acknowledgements
- research agreements and ethics approvals
- data-sharing agreements and licences
- marae, whānau or knowledge-holder expectations
- agency information-security and privacy policies
- contractual restrictions from data providers
- current vendor terms, data-processing documentation and retention settings
- current software security advisories and release notes
The purpose of this research is not to accumulate paperwork. It is to understand whether a source, tool, analysis or publication creates obligations or risks that should change the design of the mahi.
Revisit your decision
Research is not only something to do at the start. Recheck the position when:
- new datasets or document collections are added
- a public output is proposed after initially private research
- AI is introduced into an existing GIS workflow
- a local application starts using cloud features or plugins
- model or vendor terms change
- more precise locations are derived
- information from several ordinary datasets becomes sensitive when combined
- new Māori-led guidance or organisational policy is released
- mana whenua, whānau, hapū or iwi provide new direction about the information
A sound result of further research may be to continue as planned. It may also be to reduce precision, change software, remove a dataset, require additional review, keep the result internal or not map the information at all.
Related MāoriGIS.nz guidance
- Māori Data Sovereignty for GIS
- Before you use AI with Māori information
- Artificial intelligence and Māori GIS
- Who decides what?
- Open data and research
- Sensitive places
- Provenance and source checking
Last verified: 2 September 2026