Skip to main content

Authoritative for what?

Authoritative is only useful when followed by for what purpose?

A source can be excellent evidence for one question and the wrong source for another.

SourceStrong forDoes not automatically settle
LINZ cadastral parcelscurrent cadastral parcel geometry and identifierswhakapapa, local land relationships or the full meaning of whenua
Māori Land Court / Pātaka Whenua recordsMāori land record and Court contextevery current on-the-ground feature or local account
council hazard modelthe scenario, method and planning context represented by that published modelevery past or future event on the whenua
NZ Gazetteerofficial naming status and recorded geographic namesevery local, historical or preferred ingoa wāhi
Stats NZ geographystatistical reporting unitsrohe, hapū relationships or natural communities of place
historical plan or mapevidence of what that source represented at that timemodern geometry or unquestioned historical truth
iwi, hapū, whānau or local sourcelocal knowledge, relationships and context within its kaupapathe statutory purpose of a Crown dataset
field observationwhat was observed at a place and timethe complete history of the place

Use several sources without flattening them

A whenua investigation might legitimately use a Māori land block, LINZ parcel, historical survey plan, current aerial image and local kōrero at the same time. The job is not to choose one winner. It is to know what each contributes.

Conceptual flow

Record provenance with the layer

At minimum keep:

  • provider or source relationship
  • dataset or document name
  • date or version
  • what the source was created to represent
  • transformations made in the GIS
  • known limitations

See Provenance and source checking and keep those source fields in the project spreadsheet, database or GeoPackage rather than relying on a generic downloadable template.

Last reviewed: 3 September 2026